Lot of people quote part
of the Second Amendment's "The Right to Bear Arms" a lot. That is lifted out of a longer sentence which
makes the right to bear arms confusing.
The whole sentence reads:
"A
well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the
right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
I think it suggests in
order to have a well regulated militia the people should have the right to bear
arms. How many people that bear arms
belong to the state militia? In today's
times a militia would be the state's National Guard. So, do they belong to the National Guard or
are they suppose to in order to keep and bear arms?
There is also a law, Stand Your Ground Law, in some states that lets you shoot someone
dead if you feel threatened by that person.
Does that mean a poor student gets to shoot his demanding teacher, or
visa versa? I fear that law will be
tested some day.
As it stands now, people
have the right to keep and bear arms.
And apparently, it goes without saying, "Why keep and bear arms if
you can't use them?"
So, you might get shot
as an innocent person if you are in the wrong place and the wrong time. Think about all the people shot in theaters recently.
But remember, you also
have rights. If someone shoots at you, you certainly have the right to DUCK!
No comments:
Post a Comment